Some fantastic, pertinent thoughts to reflect upon.
Random thoughts on the passing scene:
How long do politicians have to keep on promising heaven and
delivering hell before people catch on, and stop getting swept away by
rhetoric?
Why should being in a professional sport exempt anyone from
prosecution for advocating deliberate violence? Recent revelations of
such advocacy of violence by an NFL coach should lead to his banishment
for life by the NFL, and criminal prosecution by the authorities. If you
are serious about reducing violence, you have to be serious about
punishing those who advocate it.
Have you noticed that what modest economic improvements we have seen
occurred during the much-lamented "gridlock" in Washington? Nor is this
unusual.
If you check back through history, doing nothing has a far
better track record than that of politicians intervening in the economy.
With all the talk about people paying their "fair share" of income
taxes, why do nearly half the people in this country pay no income taxes
at all? Is that their "fair share"? Or is creating more recipients of
government handouts, at no cost to themselves, simply a strategy to gain
more votes?
Some people are puzzled by the fact that so much that is said and
done by politicians seems remote from reality.
But reality is not what
gets politicians elected. Appearances, rhetoric and emotions are what
get them elected. Reality is what the voters and taxpayers are left to
deal with, as a result of electing them.
Instead of following the tired old formula of having politicians and
bureaucrats give college commencement speeches, in which they say how
superior it is to follow a career as politicians and bureaucrats --
"public service" -- why not invite someone like John Stossel to tell the
graduates how much better it is to go into the private sector,
supplying what people want, instead of imposing the government's will on
them?
In politics, few talents are as richly rewarded as the ability to
convince parasites that they are victims.
Welfare states on both sides
of the Atlantic have discovered that largesse to losers does not reduce
their hostility to society, but only increases it. Far from producing
gratitude, generosity is seen as an admission of guilt, and the
reparations as inadequate compensations for injustices -- leading to
worsening behavior by the recipients.
Some people say that taxes are the price we pay for civilization. But
the runaway taxes of our time are the price we pay for being gullible.
Whatever the ideology or rhetoric of the political left, their agenda
around the world has been preempting other people's decisions and
regimenting their lives.
People who believe in evolution in biology often believe in
creationism in government. In other words, they believe that the
universe and all the creatures in it could have evolved spontaneously,
but that the economy is too complicated to operate without being
directed by politicians.
The United States now has the dubious distinction of having the
highest corporate tax rate in the world. And people wonder why American
corporations are expanding overseas, providing jobs to foreigners. The
left may get their jollies attacking "the rich," but the real victims
are other people, who want the jobs that are sent overseas to escape a
hostile business climate at home.
Different people prefer different exercises. The Republicans'
favorite exercise is running for the hills. The Democrats' favorite
exercise is kicking the can down the road.
When politicians say, "spread the wealth," translate that as
"concentrate the power," because that is the only way they can spread
the wealth. And once they get the power concentrated, they can do
anything else they want to, as people have discovered -- often to their
horror -- in countries around the world.
In an old Western movie, John Wayne encounters a black man. Wayne
tells him, "I don't have a prejudiced bone in my body. I would shoot you
as quick as I would shoot any white man." That is what equality is
supposed to mean.
